Site Meter Cinema Hype » 2006 » October

Archive for October, 2006

Fantasy film festival: A Ryan and Reese retrospective

Monday, October 30th, 2006

Cinema Hype is not a celebrity gossip site, but who would we be if we claimed to live and write in a bubble? We’ll keep our crying over thoughts on Reese Witherspoon and Ryan Phillippe’s impending divorce to ourselves, but in the interest of promoting healing, we’d like to propose a brief film festival by which to celebrate the Pax Romana of a Hollywood couple we thought might actually make it.

The selections:

The Man in the Moon (1991), in which millions of adolescent girls first want to be Reese;
White Squall (1996); in which Ryan cavorts around a ship with many other hot teenage boys;
Playing by Heart (1998), in which Ryan plays solemn raver boy opposite Angelina Jolie;
Cruel Intentions (1999), during the filming of which Reese and Ryan become Reese And Ryan;
Election (1999), in which Reese ups her indie cred;
Igby Goes Down (2002), in which Ryan attempts to up his indie cred;
Legally Blonde (2001), in which Reese becomes Hollywood royalty while wearing more pink than Tori Spelling on Valentine’s Day;
Crash (2004), in which Ryan makes his play for an Oscar as a good cop gone bad; and, finally,
Walk the Line (2005), in which Reese shows off her singing voice and actually succeeds in winning that Oscar, much to Filliam H. Muffman’s disappointment.

It’s been a long, glorious ride. We at CH sincerely wish the best to both of them, and look forward to more of Ryan cavorting with other hot guys (ship optional).

Sure, it’s cute, but can it eliminate the bad guys?

Monday, October 30th, 2006

Rumor has it that Justin Long, who has a surprisingly long IMDB entry for someone who’s best known for playing the Mac in the Mac vs. PC ads, will appear in the next installment of the interminable Die Hard series. We’ll see how friendly he is when the terrorists are done with him.

Totally Un-Scary Halloween Film Festival: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit

Sunday, October 29th, 2006

First off, let me say that there is something inherently hilarious about British claymation bunnies. There’s something even more hilarious about British claymation bunnies howling at the moon. Eighty-five minutes of howling-bunny footage probably would have been enough to keep me happy, but it turns out that The Curse of the Were-Rabbit has other things to be appreciated, as well: plot, characters, adventure, silly voices, and Ralph Fiennes. Also, Wallace and Gromit and plenty of Wensleydale cheese.

I’ve seen various Wallace & Gromit short films over the years, and honestly, it’s inconceivable to me that anyone might not like our dynamic heroes and their Rube Goldberg morning routine. What’s not lovable about that, even if we do see the same thing in Pee Wee’s Big Adventure? So maybe I’m biased. But a real, full-length W&G feature seemed like a good idea to me.

Thankfully, it was. The movie is silly and crammed with puns and people will funny hairdos (not to mention the bunnies again). Director and W&G creator Nick Park clearly did his horror-movie homework and filled his movie with tiny homages to the genre, which matures it a little without making it an adults’ movie masquerading as a kids’ movie, as so many animated films seem to be lately. The story is action-packed and even gives Wallace a little chance to grow as a character, even exploring his claymation love life a little. Essentially, it’s all the goodness we can expect from W&G on a grand scale.

Reader participation: Halloween costume exchange

Sunday, October 29th, 2006

Since it’s October 29, I’m guessing there are plenty of people out there scrambling for last-minute Halloween costumes (personally, I’m smug and prepared). Thankfully, the movies are a perpetual source of excellent impersonation ideas–even if you never actually pull off your favorite costume ideas, there are always things you could be, if you had a professional seamstress and makeup artist following you around.

In that spirit, I thought the CH crew should share the costume-idea love: if you’re feeling inspired, tell us 1) how you’re dressing up this Halloween, if you’re dressing up, and 2) your favorite movie-inspired costume idea. If you can only furnish #2, that’s good enough for us, but we might call you a party pooper. We hope you don’t mind.

Anyway, I’ll start. On Tuesday, I’m going as Betty Crocker. As for my favorite movie-ish costumes, I’ve always wanted to dress as Velma from Scooby Doo.

Next?

Pirate Costumes Officially licensed Pirates of the Caribbean costumes available now at Halloween Express.

Quotation Sensation #1

Saturday, October 28th, 2006

Today I’m introducing a new Cinema Hype feature: Quotation Sensation. Here’s how it works: I throw out a random (or not-so-random, if I’m feeling theme-ish) movie quotation. You respond with the movie, actor, and character who said the quotation. If you’re right, you get…ta-da…bragging rights! And–brace yourself–a CH-sponsored cheer, complete with toe-touching and back flips and the throwing of tiny people! It’ll be great. Answers from memory are encouraged, but the Quotation Police will not hunt you down if you cheat use Google.

Today’s Quotation Sensation:

“I’m the Mary. I’m the Mary!”

The exception proves the rule, especially when there’s zombies.

Saturday, October 28th, 2006

I know I said I’m going horror-free, but:

Shaun of the Dead! On Saturday night! Before Halloween!

It’s not horror if it’s full of nerdy Brits, right? And Lucy Davis. There’s nothing scary about Lucy Davis.

Totally Un-Scary Halloween Film Festival: It’s the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown!

Saturday, October 28th, 2006

Plenty of questions spring to mind after watching It’s the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown!, including “Who gives rocks to trick-or-treaters?,” “What are the odds of all the supposed rocks ending up in Charlie Brown’s candy bag?,” and “Who makes a list of people not to invite to a party?” But there’s one other question that’s going to stay with me:

Why are they all such haters?

If Linus and his stripey hair and worried eyes want to sit outside all night, waiting for the Great Pumpkin to rise up out of the pumpkin patch with his bag of toys for all of the good little girls and boys, why must everyone judge? Don’t they know that not all who wander are lost? He’s a dreamer. A visionary. Jeez, Lucy.

I’ve seen the various Charlie Brown holiday movies off and on since I was a kid. As an adult, I find that they’re not really very plotty–mostly, the kids are mean to each other (specifically, the girls are mean to the boys), and then there are little punchlines. Snoopy dresses up as the World War I Flying Ace and gets shot down, but it doesn’t really pertain to the story much, except when Linus mistakes him for the Great Pumpkin. It’s all a little strange. But then there’s that awesome, classic Vince Guaraldi score, and all is forgiven. Somehow, everything Guaraldi wrote for Charlie Brown is ageless and seasonless, and seems just right, no matter what. And in October, it’s just fall, the way it was meant to be.

The Bridge

Friday, October 27th, 2006

How does a director make a documentary about suicide? Ignoring for a moment the potential ethical dilemmas embroiled in real-life coverage of people ending their own lives, how does one get that particular kind of candid footage? If you’re director Eric Steel, you just need to know where to go and how to hide the camera.

Steel directed the newly released documentary The Bridge, about people who commit suicide by jumping off the Golden Gate Bridge. The film was inspired by Tad Friend’s 2003 New Yorker article, which gave a rundown of the past and present of bridge-jumping. It was a popular article. I live near the Golden Gate, and in the Bay Area, at least, that article struck a nerve–I remember reading it at the time, and I’ve never heard of a single article so often referred to by so many different people over the years.

It seems that the Golden Gate Bridge itself strikes a nerve with people. It’s the number-one suicide spot in the United States–someone jumps off of it approximately every two weeks. In a way, it’s not hard to see why; walking or driving across, there’s the feeling of being on the very edge of the world. Standing on the ocean side–from which most people jump–there are the cliffs on either end of the bridge, and then water, and fog, and nothing else.

In 2004, Steel and his crew attached hidden cameras to the bridge, then went away and just waited. Much of the film, it seems, is made up of interviews with the victims’ loved ones, with the people who last spoke with them, with the people who knew them best. There are copies of suicide notes and other mementoes of the people who jumped, and an interview with one man who jumped and survived. But the crux of the movie, what is most haunting and most disturbing about this film, is the footage taken by the hidden cameras–nearly all of the twenty-four people who jumped in 2004 did so on film.

I haven’t seen The Bridge, and I don’t know that I will, not because it’s not a good movie, but because it seems like such an intrusion. Maybe some of the people caught on camera needed an intrusion, and maybe not. But it’s the experience of essentially being present–even two years later–for another human’s death that makes this movie dicey and understandably difficult to watch. I’m not saying Steel was wrong to make the movie or even to install the cameras; I’m just saying I don’t know that I can watch it.

Beaten to the punch

Thursday, October 26th, 2006

So, I’d been planning this long, involved post about Kirsten Dunst and how I don’t really like her, and I don’t really think she’s a very good actress, but I still somehow end up seeing all of her movies. It was going to be a really good post, I promise.

But then the celebrity gurus at Fametracker said it first, and said it best. I bow to their Bring It On-loving genius, and will now think of good old Kirsten every time I put a drink down on the coffee table.

A few questions for the makers of Running with Scissors

Thursday, October 26th, 2006

1. Did you buy two preview slots on purpose?

I saw the Running with Scissors preview on several occasions, and every time, it ran twice: as the first and last preview.

2. WHY? Why do you insist on taking up precious preview time? It doesn’t make us like you.

3. Are you trying to be The Royal Tenenbaums?

We see the appeal, here. We love wacky families living in big houses, too. We also kind of like Gwyneth Paltrow when she’s being sardonic, even though we wish it were an act and not just…her. But trust us: some movies don’t need a sequel, and anyway, you aren’t Wes Anderson. This is something to accept so that you may move on.

4. Did you deliberately make a misleading preview?

I suspect that in this case, the studio execs–or whoever it was that made decisions regarding the advertising of this movie–fell prey to a common misconception: that “1970s pop music” equals “light, charming movie containing truths about life” in the mind of the average viewer. I’ve been that viewer before–Stepmom and The Family Stone, you should be blushing right about now–and I’ve learned my lesson. Do you know what “1970s pop music” actually means when it appears in a movie preview? It means “Heavy family drama that nobody would see if we told them what it’s really about.” I don’t mean to say they’re bad movies, or that I don’t like family dramas; I do. I’m just getting better at spotting them for what they really are.

I’m also not trying to suggest that Running with Scissors won’t be interesting and funny. There will be hijinks, I’m sure, and perhaps “Right Back Where We Started From” will actually play at some time during the movie. There will be laughter and dancing. But knowing what I know of Augusten Burroughs’s life, and seeing what I’ve seen in the preview, I’m just saying: it could be pretty heavy, and I’m not sure that comes across in the ad campaign.

5. Alec Baldwin: Genius? Or Alec Baldwin: Huge, Huge Jerk? Or both?

I’m not actually expecting an answer on this. I’m just curious.

Totally Un-Scary Halloween Film Festival: The Nightmare Before Christmas

Thursday, October 26th, 2006

Who invented the Halloween movie? I’m not talking about horror; all-purpose terror is multi-seasonal (or non-seasonal, if you’re me). Instead, somebody somewhere decided that we need movies that are only truly appropriate once a year, that celebrate our love of scary things without ever actually being scary, that revel in simply being silly or quirky or just generally a little macabre. I’m talking It’s the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown, Ernest Scared Stupid, The Curse of the Were-Rabbit–movies that celebrate costumes and candy and cut-up pumpkins, and call it good. In the spirit of those movies and the people behind them, I’m holding a short film festival for myself: the Totally Un-Scary Halloween Film Festival, in which I’ll be watching and writing about classic and contemporary Halloween-centric movies. Feel free to make up the costume of your choice (I’m going as “girl wrapped in warm quilt on sofa, with laptop”), fill up on the good candy, and watch or read along.

The primary question about our first TUSHFF entry is this: Does The Nightmare Before Christmas actually count as a Halloween movie? I’ve heard not. It does feature the word “Christmas” fairly prominently in the title. And there is some ho-ho-ho-ing that goes on, by someone in a red suit, no less. The Easter Bunny even makes a (brief but somewhat hilarious) appearance. However, I’d like to bring up an important point: Jack Skellington may be obsessed with Christmas, but he’s still the Pumpkin King. He’s played in the snow, he’s brought winter and lights and a little bit of “terrible” cheer to Halloween Town, he’s flown in his coffin-sleigh behind his eight bony reindeer, but he’s ready to pick up his Halloween responsibilities again. He’s not giving up on Halloween; he’s just expanding his own horizons a little. It’s all about Halloween roots! Yeah.

Also: TIM BURTON. ‘Nuff said.

Whatever its holiday affiliation, The Nightmare Before Christmas is a quick, fun movie, like Edward Gorey in motion. The story is actually kind of sweet–Jack trying to bust out of his Halloween funk, and finding himself obsessed with Christmas; Sally trying to save him from his own disaster–but the humor is unabashedly dark, in the tradition of Gorey and Roald Dahl, with whose work Burton is clearly well acquainted, having now put several of his books on film. It’s refreshing, quirky, and probably unlike anything you’ve seen that wasn’t made by Burton himself. Also excellent are the songs, written and performed by Danny Elfman.

To steal someone else’s rating system: Two thumbs up. And if you’re really worried about the multiple-holiday thing, just relax and watch it at Thanksgiving.

Does not compute.

Monday, October 23rd, 2006

Guys, I’ve got it. We’re gonna make the best movie ever–take the industry by storm! You’ll see. We’ll start with–hear me out, now–Bruce Willis. Then we’ll bring in Justin Timberlake. Don’t worry. I know a guy who knows a guy. And then we’ll make a movie about kidnapping and creating a brand-new kind of drug lord! It’ll be like nothing they’ve ever seen before!

Oh, wait. Someone’s already doing that. Guess we’ll have to come up with something else.

Review: The Prestige

Monday, October 23rd, 2006

Early in Christopher Nolan’s movie The Prestige, Michael Caine’s character taunts the audience with a bit of magic-show truth: “if you’re looking for the secret, you won’t find it, because you’re not really looking,” he says. It’s clear that Caine isn’t just talking about magic; he’s offering advice to the film’s audience, as well: You’re welcome to look for the sleight of hand; that’s natural, and maybe you’ll find it. But the fun here is in sitting back and enjoying what there is to see, taking in the magic, and being surprised at the end. Turns out he’s right.

The Prestige, based on Christopher Priest’s 1996 novel of the same name, tells the story of two magicians in turn-of-the-century London (Hugh Jackman and Christian Bale) and their growing personal and professional rivalry. It’s a dark story, full of obsession and revenge–apparently just the kind of thing Nolan thrives on, as he is also working with Bale on the current spate of Batman movies–as well as a complicated plot with plenty of chances for misdirection.

In making The Prestige, Nolan clearly understands and relishes his role as magician: he’s taken everything the movie has to say about performing magic and applied it carefully to his own movie, then used the extra time and energy to put his own dark kind of curlicues on it. The distinction is an important one in this film. The first, most basic step for any magician is simply to be able to pull off a trick–to make something vanish, or saw someone in half, or whatever. But any trick and any film, even if they’re executed perfectly, still fail if the magician doesn’t engage the audience. There’s an upping of the ante, a creation of mood, that needs to happen. Lucky for us, Nolan is technical enough of a director to tell his tale well, and enough of a showman to sell it. The Prestige is a big story, and Nolan acknowledges its size, gives it the time it needs, and lets it fill up the screen. He has a good feel for the magical, the details that will intrigue the audience–his willingness to be a little morbid and his eye for striking images supply the necessary tension, and strong performances by charismatic actors make the story pop. Also, David Bowie turns up in the role of Nikola Tesla. And if that’s not street cred, then I think we’re finished here.

It’s not a perfect film. The initial series of incidents between the two magicians lacks the necessary sense of increasing urgency, so that the situation makes sense intellectually, but feels a little slack. Bale and Jackman both give good performances, but playing the crazy obviously comes a little less naturally to Jackman than it does to Bale (who’s just sort of…like that; I think he just gets up on the tortured side of the bed). So while the story is very much about Jackman’s character, Bale uses up a disproportionate amount of the energy onscreen, just by showing up and breathing. And most importantly, the resolution of the plot is mildly disappointing–the audience will either pick up on the clues early on, and miss the fun of the reveal, or they’ll find it eye-rollingly simple when everything finally comes out. It’s to be expected; as Caine’s character points out earlier in the movie, the secret behind any magic trick is never as interesting as the trick itself. In telling us the whys and hows of the plot, there’s a tiny bit of letdown–we wanted to believe, and it’s a little glaring when we can see all of the wires and pulleys we thought we were looking for. However, Nolan makes a wise move by not letting the story settle there, and the new information–what would be the end of most movies–engenders a whole new set of eleventh-hour twists and turns. The plot literally continues through the final shot of the film, so that the credits leave the audience still feeling steamrolled. That’s a good feeling for any director.

In the end, The Prestige is a satisfying film–not a flawless film, but one that feels big and complex, like it’s done everything it should do, even if you wish just a little that you hadn’t seen how it’s all done.

What in the what what?: Marie Antoinette

Saturday, October 21st, 2006

Sofia Coppola’s movie Marie Antoinette was released yesterday to a small storm of high-minded criticism calling it empty, beautiful but insignificant, and a string of other self-righteous insults. Personally, I’m trying to think about this movie intelligently without being obnoxious about it. I have issues with the hipster vibe of the movie, but on a certain level, who am I to judge? I like The Cure as much as the next girl. I have to admit, though, that the more I think about Marie Antoinette, the more I find myself genuinely confused by Coppola and what she’s trying to do, and how she’s trying to do it (or not).

Let me first say that while I found Lost in Translation to be all kinds of dull, I felt like I understood where Coppola was coming from as a filmmaker and a storyteller: it’s a small story, a split-second connection between two people who are otherwise totally unconnected. There’s not much plot there, but there is an appeal to that kind of Impressionist capturing of a moment. It makes some sense.

Where Coppola loses me, I think, is in the making of a movie that appears to be both a trifle and an attempt at social commentary. On one hand, it seems to me that Marie Antoinette is intended to be much like its heroine: beautiful, well-dressed, and a little inconsequential. Coppola is fascinated by the aesthetic of 18th-century Versailles, and it appears that she’s made a two-hour commercial for petit fours, extravagant shoes, and hip music. This doesn’t bother me, in and of itself; if she wants to contribute something unabashedly pretty to the world, fine. She’s being an aesthete, and while I’m sure there are cheaper ways to go about creating beauty, I’m not going to tell her what to do.

But I also get the sense that Coppola is trying to Say Something about the nature of youth and beauty and pleasure, and that’s what throws me off. Are we supposed to gather that Marie Antoinette is some kind of subtly tortured soul as Kirsten Dunst (literally) runs around Versailles in her enormous dresses? Are we supposed to equate the pleasures of her life with the inevitability of her death, or is Coppola trying to make us see the woman inside the costume, implying some kind of courage or strength of character? It’s hard to tell, especially since there doesn’t seem to be much in the way of, say, story or plot or real character development.

Which brings me to my other point of confusion about Marie Antoinette: is there a story here, and does Coppola actually care? As far as I can tell, there’s no relationship between Queen Marie and, well, anybody, least of all King Louis XVI (played by Jason Schwartzman). The lack of meaningful interaction and the screenplay–which even the most positive reviewers thus far have admitted is not great–imply to me that this is another movie about another disconnected young woman, but that even the small moments of recognition from Lost in Translation may not take place this time. So we may be left with a set and a character and nothing else. I guess the question here is: Regardless of what Coppola’s trying to do or not do, does her movie actually work as a movie? And if it doesn’t, does she care? Is that the point?

Again, I’m reserving (outward) judgment for the moment. Maybe I’ll see the movie, and all will become clear in the glow of that funny thing Kirsten Dunst does with her mouth. At this point, there’s really no telling.

Nice soundtrack, though.

An Open Letter to Alison Lohman

Thursday, October 19th, 2006

Dear Alison,

We see that you have a new movie, Flicka, coming out this weekend.

Honey, can we talk to you about something?

The thing is, you’re 27 years old. And we know you got some good reviews for Matchstick Men. We see that. But, honey, we want you to move on. Take some roles beyond high school. We hear that you’re quite the actress, and while maybe playing a teenager is a challenge for you–it should be, by now–we think that you should stretch your skills a little. You know, go for something a little…older.

If you need some advice, or just someone to talk to about this important issue, call 1-800-GABRIELLE CARTERIS.

Hugs,

The crew at Cinema Hype

About Cinema Hype

A blog about all things film: the good, the bad, and the really, really ugly. Check us out for news, reviews, haikus, and also other things that don't rhyme, like movie quotations, polls, and commentary. And we won't throw popcorn at you or kick your seat.

Cinema Hype Author(s)
    » Liz

Entertainment & Music Channel Posts

Hot Off The Press

  • New York Fashion Week Spring 2009: Time for a Change
    When flipping through press photos of Fashion Weeks' runways today I realized that I tend to look at the same designers almost everytime, checking to see if any have gone outside of their normal box. [...]
  • It's a beautiful day in the neighborhood...
    ....and Keesha is STILL sleeping. Jerry is up and with Memphis in the back yard. general chitchat, between long periods of silence. I miss Dan. When's he coming back?! 6:15 - Skippy is [...]
  • Tracy sets course record
    Ethan Tracy posts course record in Maryland. [...]
  • The VMA’s
    MTV will air their annual Video Music Awards tonight at 9PM EST. It seems there are big things happening at this years awards. As I am sure you all know Britney Spears is opening the show, the real [...]
  • Retcon Patrol 1-16: "The Other Walker"
    Today continues our summer-long journey through the first season of Brothers & Sisters, from our perspective here at the end of Season Two. As with our re-view of Episodes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [...]
  • Listen to Mick Foley Explain his WWE Departure, Edge and Christian Re-unite??
    The audio of Mick Foley's appearance on "Opie and Anthony" for Sam Roberts' birthday last week is now available online. You can listen to it by clicking here. Please be in an non-vulgar hearing [...]
  • New Promo Spot for NBC's Monday Night Lineup
    NBC has a new promo for it's Monday Night lineup, which will include Chuck, Heroes and Christian Slater's new show, My Own Worst Enemy.   [...]
  • Always Moving
    As a performer, I have been "always moving" for the past three years. It has been well worth it and it feels incredibly unnatural to be staying at my permanent home in New York for three months [...]
  • Fish oil helps heart patients
    Fish oil supplements may work slightly better than a popular cholesterol-reducing drug to help patients with chronic heart failure, according to new research released Sunday. Chronic heart failure [...]
  • True Original "Killer Kowalski", Ashley Masarro's Secret
    "Two roads diverged in a wood, and I took the one less traveled by, and that has made all the difference.” — Robert Frost It takes a different breed to become a professional wrestler. But [...]