Site Meter Cinema Hype

Reader Participation: The soundtrack of our lives

by

linclarkin

I just added a movie soundtrack to my iTunes.

I know what you’re going to ask: Away We Go, or (500) Days of Summer? If I were you, I’d think the same thing. An awful lot of people that like the same things I like are celebrating the summer of 2009 and the rise of the hipster romance by discovering Alexi Murdoch and rediscovering The Smiths, and with good reason. Good guess.

So I won’t be offended if you smirk a little when I tell you what I’m really bopping along to these days: Hairspray. Not even the original; the re-make. I love it, you guys. I’ve had “Without Love” and “You Can’t Stop the Beat” and (randomly) “Ladies’ Choice” for a long time; somehow, I thought that I didn’t need the whole thing. And oh, was I wrong. You think you don’t need Christopher Walken singing “You’re Timeless to Me,” but you do. You think Elijah Kelley on “Run and Tell That” isn’t totally necessary in your life, but you’re wrong. And by you, I mean me.

Movie soundtracks are like that, though. They’re eclectic; they’re just as likely to be riddled with bad (or at least not-great) songs as they are to be good to the last drop—as with (500) Days of Summer, where you can get Regina Spektor’s “Us” if you also want Hall and Oates’s “You Make My Dreams Come True” to spring up every time you use the Shuffle function. Or, if they’re tied immediately to the story (as in a musical), they can be extremely specific—good background for a fictional life, maybe, but not so much for a real one. Soundtracks, ironically, sometimes don’t make the best background music.

On the other hand, when they’re good, they can be great, and for many of the same reasons that they’re not great. They’re eclectic; they introduce us to artists we would never have heard otherwise. And they’re specific: they’re a little reminder, over and over again, of the time we went to see that movie, and we felt just the way the songs make us feel, and we liked it enough that we wanted to hear that experience over and over again.

So, readers, what’s your favorite movie soundtrack, and why?

, , , , , , , , , ,

Quotation Sensation: Catch-Up Edition

by

sex_and_the_city_movie_promo

Regular watchers of this space will be shocked—shocked!—to discover that I am, once again, running behind on the movie quotage. Or, really, it’s the rewardage to the movie quotage that’s suffering: faithful reader Brady correctly identified the last Quotation Sensation (from the Sex and the City movie) something appalling like three weeks ago, and here I am going on vacation and nattering on about roller derby, and totally denying him his rightful cheer.

So let’s fix that, shall we?

We don’t ever wonder why
You watch Sex and the Ci-T-Y
It’s bold
It’s gold
You break the mold
Go Brady!

And now, let’s move on to a new Sensation, shall we?

The Rules

I will post a quotation from a movie. The first person to comment with the character, actor, and film that contains this quotation gets a special eyelash batting and a tailor-made Cinema Hype cheer, which might actually rhyme, even if it doesn’t make any sense.

The Deadline

If somebody guesses correctly, the prize cheer goes up as soon as possible. If nobody gets it right, I’m off the hook cheer-wise, and the next quotation is posted on Friday (…or not, like this week, but Friday is the norm) (Actually, this is proving to be the case less and less often. We’ll say I’ll shoot for sometime around the weekend. Friday, Sunday, Monday…something around there.)

The Quotation

“‘Hey, um, great suit. Is that an Armani?’
‘Yes. Yes, it is.’
‘I thought so. So, what do you do?’
‘I’m a suit salesman.’
‘Would you excuse me? I cut my foot before and my shoe is filling up with blood.’”

Think you know the answer? Leave it in the comments.

, , , ,

Whip It: Good!

by

Before I start writing about Whip It, the upcoming roller derby movie slash Drew Barrymore’s directorial debut, you should probably all know that I’m going through a bit of a roller derby phase lately. Maybe it’s my desire to be Pamie when I grow up; maybe it’s my friend Donna, who’s down in Richmond and supplements her double life as a PBS employee and mom to a four-year-old with a third existence as a derby girl. I like the culture of it—the combination of challenge and support, of sheer bloodlust and weird sorority-style bonding. (DC does have roller derby, and don’t think I haven’t looked into it–I’m currently without a team sport. But I don’t know, you guys. I worked really hard to grow all of these teeth.)

I thought, for about a minute, that maybe a roller derby movie would be my next creative project—that with the little renaissance swelling up in American derby these days, maybe the genre’s time had come. Before I even got the thought out, Barrymore beat me to the punch. She’s like the Jesus to my Brian: SHE found a script written by, you know, an actual derby girl. SHE knew Ellen Page. SHE had money. And, like, cameras. So when you put it like that, I think I’ll take my cue. Good day, sir!

I would be so sad if the movie looked bad; maybe I should be even sadder that it looks so awesome. Because it does look awesome. I’m calling it out now: I am going to see this, and I’m going to love it, and so is everybody else, and then statistics for self-propelled mobile violence among women in this country are going to skyrocket. Take my word for it.

(On a related note: If you are even remotely interested in Drew Barrymore, or if you want to know how she pulled off Little Edie’s crazy voice in Grey Gardens, or if you just like cool interviews of any kind, you MUST listen to her Fresh Air conversation with Terry Gross, available for free here. Not kidding. You’ll be a fan forever.)

, , , , ,

Comic-Con 2009: Seeing the sights

by

As noted, CH didn’t make it to San Diego Comic-Con 2009 this year—2010, for maybes?—but that doesn’t mean we haven’t been communing with the geeks this weekend, via both the ether and the information superhighway. You guys: this is what Youtube was made for. And so we present some Comic-Con highlights as presented by those energetic enough to post video from their hotel rooms each night. Thanks, guys!

One of the top-flight movies making a debut was Iron Man 2, with a panel including director Jon Favreau, Robert Downey Jr., Don Cheadle (replacing Terence Howard as Rhodey), and new cast members Sam Rockwell(!) and Scarlett Johansson. The preliminary footage shown went over so well that Cheadle demanded that they show it twice. Audience members did not object.

Jason Bateman–who is maybe taking over movies, like, as a genre?–turned up to promote his upcoming Mike Judge movie, Extract, which takes place in a food-extract factory and stars Bateman, Ben Affleck, Mila Kunis, and J.K. Simmons, and therefore cannot fail. Period.

Cameron Diaz and James Marsden showed up to talk about their new “what would you do?”-type thriller, The Box, which comes out October 30 and is sure to be a hit, at least among the genre crowd: think director Richard “Donnie Darko” Kelly adapting Richard Matheson’s short story-turned-Twilight Zone episode “Button, Button.” Awesome and creepy.

Lastly–and much-posted-about; if the robots take over, I suspect the tweens will be responsible–Twilight: New Moon chatted about…well. Something that I’m sure I would know about were I to actually watch the panel. Should you choose to watch this, you might also close the windows: you won’t hear anything, but every dog in the neighborhood will suddenly appear at your door.

Finally, if you think Comic-Con is all about panels and celebrities, you’ve got it all wrong. This is world-class people watching. Here, some guy from Mania.com checks out (and talks to) some of the “characters” roaming the halls of the San Diego Convention Center. Just in case, you know, you’ve missed your spandex quota for the day.

Enjoy! And think of next year.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

An open letter to the geeks: Take me with you!

by

comiccon11

To all of you in San Diego this weekend, to all of you who took time off from your (ostensible) jobs to indulge the passion for pop culture, to the true fans among us who know it all and want to see it all (and especially to those of you who clog up the question queues with your unpreparedness and your photo requests), I have three words: We hate you.

Sure, it’s very much against the generally friendly Comic-Con vibe, but we’re not ashamed. We hate that you and Sigourney Weaver get to talk about “Wonder Women: Female Power Icons in Pop Culture,” and that we don’t even get to ask our pal Sig (we get to call her that) whether she’ll shave her head again. We hate that you can see Jim Caviezel in the AMC miniseries remake of The Prisoner, while we just think he’s Jesus. We hate that there’s a Pixar panel with Hayao Miyazaki (what?!) and we’re stuck at home with his mind-altering, award-winning hand-animated movies (by HAND? Who DOES that?). We hate that you can bring your sketchbook and draw a posing Amanda Palmer—the singer and Dresden Dolls “frontwoman” who is also dating Neil Gaiman and is the subject of the photographic book Who Killed Amanda Palmer? and this confusing yet?—and all we get to sketch is, like, regular things. If we were to, you know, sketch regular things. We hate that you’re going to see which adorably outlandish British outfit Doctor Who’s David Tennant’s going to wear, and we haven’t even finished season four yet. We hate that you’ll be at the panel called “Bram Stoker: The Joss Whedon of His Day?” and, well, we won’t. We’re sorry that you get to experience world-class people-watching, and we’ve just got the National Mall for our entertainment. (WHATEVER, LINCOLN.)

We do not hate that you get to attend the Twilight: New Moon panel, but that’s what you get, isn’t it?

Also, would you mind sticking some of this up on Youtube for us? That’ll almost make up for your callous betrayal of the poor and the far-away. Almost.

Sincerely and with malice,

Liz

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Note to Katherine Heigl: YOU ARE NOT HELPING

by

If you read this blog with any regularity at all, you probably know that I am generally unoffended by the norms of the modern romantic comedy—on occasion, I’ll even fight for these films’ right to be ridiculous. It’s not just that I like watching the quirky ingenue get the guy (though let’s face it: I do). To me, it amounts to a weird kind of genre discrimination: the same people who would never dream of demanding a lesson on gun control from a Western get their knickers in a twist when a so-called “chick flick” ends with shopping and cute boys.

But even I cannot, in good conscience, hang with the trailer for The Ugly Truth, which comes out Friday.

So let’s see: under the guise of “educating” Abby (Katherine Heigl) about men (gee, how nice of him), Mike (Gerard Butler) gets to turn her into his own perfect girl, no questions asked? The way I see it, this turns out one of two ways: 1) Abby falls for Mike and vice versa, and as they lean in for the first kiss of their happily-ever-after life, she thanks him for imparting so much knowledge to her feeble brain; 2) Abby plays Mike and gains a modicum of self-respect, and then thanks him for imparting so much confidence to her feeble psyche; or 3) Mike falls for Abby “just as she is” (thank you, Bridget Jones), reforms or doesn’t, and she gets to thank him for screwing with her self-confidence and then putting it all back together. In none of these cases does anybody get the karmic pleasure of beating him over the head with that baseball stadium hot dog. So, basically, tragedy ensues.

Why does “If he doesn’t like you, it’s his loss” have to become “If he doesn’t like you, it’s your fault”? Doesn’t this girl have any friends? Sure, we all do crazy things in these situations, but this would be their cue. Even worse, maybe the self-esteem pep talk comes out of Mike’s mouth, in which case Abby can officially thank him for teaching her the ways of the big, manly world (and then make out with him). As Liz Lemon so wisely pointed out that one time, “It’s like those Dove commercials never even happened!”

Maybe I’m wrong. Maybe it’s a marketing thing. I notice that The Ugly Truth is written by two women; maybe it has hidden depths and is actually all about self-actualization, and Abby decides she’s happy being her awesome self without the benefit of all these handsome man-gods running around. We can only hope. But as it currently stands, I think even Rebecca Bloomwood would roll her eyes and go shopping instead. As well she should.

, , , , , ,

Johnny Depp warns of the evils of STDs

by

pubicenemies

Sweet of him, don’t you think? But I wonder what he’s doing with that machine gun?

, , ,

What I learned from Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince

by

harry-potter-and-the-half-blood-prince

Whoever told us that ignorance is bliss was on to something.

I’ve read Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince twice, but I suffer from what I suspect is a fairly common (made-up-on-the-spot) affliction: Rowling’s Amnesia, where I completely forget the details of Harry Potter’s life while still remaining totally conversant with his universe. Really: Ask me anything. Floo powder? Time-turners? Bertie Bott’s Every-Flavor Beans? I’ve got your back. On the other hand, what exactly happened to Dumbledore’s wand? Fuzzy. What was the deal, exactly, with Cornelius Fudge in Goblet of Fire? Couldn’t tell you. What’s going on with Dobby right now? Not a clue.

When I saw Half Blood Prince, I thanked my lucky stars for impending senility.

I loved it. Director David Yates is working hard at refining the series’s visual style, and, free of the bitterness that comes with actually remembering the events of the novel, I was free to enjoy the show. Yates is a fantastic visual storyteller–his economy with words and his generousness with the camera are perfect for Rowling’s expansive sense of place (known in some circles as overdescription), and even the well-placed CGI adds lushness and decisiveness to the picture. I loved the horror-show feel of the cave scene and the (apparently non-canon, not that I would remember this) burning of the Burrow; I loved the obsession with Scottish scenery; I loved Half Blood Prince as the Sweet Valley High of the Potter series. I remember Harry and Ginny being different in the book, but I didn’t mind the change. I know there were other detours away from the novel, but I didn’t notice them much—I was too wrapped up in what Yates was doing to obsess over what he wasn’t doing, plot-wise. If nothing else, we know he’s also directing both installments of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows—yes, it’s split into two films—and can hope that the continuity of the series remains intact.

So maybe if I didn’t have a brain like a sieve, I’d be shaking my fist right now, and writing angry compare-and-contrast papers, just like my seventh-grade English teacher taught me. Instead, I’m enjoying the starry-eyed thrill that comes with not really remembering the details, and seeing it as if for the very first time.

, , , , , ,

(500) Days: Laughing through tears or crying through the giggles?

by

500-days

In the next few weeks, the new movie (500) Days of Summer will be called a romantic comedy over and over, and each time, writers Scott Neustadter and Michael H. Weber will die a little inside. The movie they wrote is not a romantic comedy, not the way audiences are used to seeing romantic comedies. Instead, it is a comedy about romance—a fine but important distinction. First thing, the narrator warns us, “This is a story about love. It is not a love story.”

It speaks to the power of the term “romantic comedy”—a designation that, in association with this movie, I picked up from some anonymous media source and not from my own experience of either the ads or the movie itself—that, even as the climax came and went, I was not sure what to believe about the ending. The writers had warned me, had essentially shown me the future. And yet. “They said it was a romantic comedy!” I thought, around Day 488. “So maybe they’re leading me on.” They weren’t.

It’s–somewhat self-consciously–a collage of a movie, told in bits and pieces, out of order, in mixed media. Director Marc Webb comes from music videos, and it shows, but in a good way. The wide variety of vintage-y visual techniques he employs descends into self-consciousness from time to time (a total catch-22: he’s called boring if he doesn’t use them, and twee if he does), but Webb is saved by the bell—or, rather, the script. For every cutely hip moment, there’s a joke to cut the sweetness, some almost Coen-esque left hook of dialogue to remind us who we’re dealing with and where we’re ultimately going. It’s a very funny movie, full of quick humor and wry raises of the eyebrow, and for the most part it works—especially due to Gordon-Levitt and his total commitment to being an adorable sap. (In addition, for every acid joke, there’s a moment of crushing despair. This also helps to curb the sugar level a bit.)

For what it’s worth, Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Zooey Deschanel make the perfect hipster couple—he is scandalously good-looking but comes off as if he doesn’t really buy it; she runs on charm, a swingy ponytail, and a killer singing voice. Eventually, the relatability question comes up: would we like Tom and Summer in real life? Would we want to go to their parties and hang out in their version of L.A.? Would we root for them? I’m not sure I would—Tom makes even his fictional friends roll their eyes with his sensitivity and also his total inability to listen to reason, while Summer makes herself clear but also leads Tom on in a way that isn’t totally attractive. But that’s one of the writers’ victories: we might not like them, exactly, but we certainly recognize them, possibly even in (hopefully younger, less mature versions of) ourselves. And in a comedy about romance, well, that’s just about the highest compliment there is.

, , , , , , , , , ,

Don’t make Earhart too heavy

by

I expect that the only people that are more excited about this trailer than I am—the basic fact of its release, anyway—are the people who made it. The Amelia Earhart biopic has been bopping around Hollywood for at least a decade now—originally, Meg Ryan was slated to star, and this was before her hair got long and her lips got big. Think You’ve Got Mail-era Meg hopping into a biplane, and here we go.

On the other hand, whether it’s the spirit of Earhart or just the irresistible nature of a woman pilot lost at sea, somebody was going to put this on the big screen eventually. Leading ladies come and go, but a spunky woman who dares and fails, well, that’s catnip to the filmmaking type—even if it happened in 2032 and starred Elle Fanning as the original flygirl, Amelia Earhart was inevitable.

That said, I hope it’s fun. I trust Hilary Swank to be excellent, but I’m not sure I trust her to have a good time, in which case I’d frankly rather watch Amy Adams’s adorably screwball Earheart from Night at the Museum 2. This is, after all, a woman that titled her autobiography For the Fun of It—surely anything dry or over-serious, anything resembling Seabiscuit with a woman instead of a horse, wouldn’t have (sorry about this:) flown. I’m not saying the drama isn’t there; I’m not saying Earhart’s courage and pluck aren’t significant. But we’d better get at least a hoot and/or a holler out of Swank, or this critic will be mightily disappointed.

, , , , , , ,

Quotation Sensation

by

i_survived_a_japanese_game_show

Heyyyyyyy! How’ve you all been? This recent blog vacation was necessary, but it’s good to be back from the Land of No Movies—a life where nobody cares about pictures of Johnny Depp in orange and magenta eyeliner is no life for me, it turns out. I thought we’d get back in the groove—stretch the old movie muscles—with a brand-new round of Quotation Sensation. What do you say?

Let’s go.

The Rules

I will post a quotation from a movie. The first person to comment with the character, actor, and film that contains this quotation gets a special eyelash batting and a tailor-made Cinema Hype cheer, which might actually rhyme, even if it doesn’t make any sense.

The Deadline

If somebody guesses correctly, the prize cheer goes up as soon as possible. If nobody gets it right, I’m off the hook cheer-wise, and the next quotation is posted on Friday (…or not, like this week, but Friday is the norm) (Actually, this is proving to be the case less and less often. We’ll say I’ll shoot for sometime around the weekend. Friday, Sunday, Monday…something around there.)

The Quotation

“‘Would you want to get married?’
‘Well, I didn’t…didn’t think that was an option.’
‘What if it was an option?’
‘Why? What? Do you want to get married?’
‘I wouldn’t mind being married to you. Would you mind being married to me?’
‘No, no, not…not if that’s what you wanted. I mean…is…is that what you want?’
‘I want you. So, okay.’
‘So really, we’re…we’re getting married?’
‘We’re getting married. Should we get you a diamond?’
‘No. No. Just get me a really big closet.’”

Think you know the answer? Leave it in the comments.

Let’s talk soon, shall we? Nice to see you all.

, ,

Just dropping by

by

madhatter

I’m supposed to be on a bit of a blog vacation this week–parents visiting, a bit of deadline-y nonsense coming up for something else–but there are just so many filmy things going on that I couldn’t help but stop in. It’s like how Jon Stewart goes away for a week and we, like, invade Canada or start holding So You Think You Can Dance tryouts on the White House lawn, or some such nonsense. Call me a workaholic (…right); I couldn’t stay away.

Here are a few fun links to news and notes, just to tide everybody over:

Super-fantastic images from Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland. I am undecided about the idea of Alice 2!, or whatever this sequelly thing is, but then, it doesn’t really matter, does it? Who, having seen these promo shots, is going to sit this one out?

So, you may have heard that Aaron Sorkin is writing a movie about Facebook, ostensibly as a continuation of his long-term love-hate relationship with the internet and the people who use it to talk about him. And now David Fincher’s in talks to direct. So are we talking Facebook: Suspense!, or will the entire internet be aging backwards?

Via comingsoon.net, a write-up of James Cameron’s new 3-D movie Avatar, which is supposedly the first made-for-3D movie to make proper use of new technology. Sounds amazing, and this from somebody who was sufficiently traumatized by Captain EO to hate 3D movies well into adulthood. (Note that this Avatar is NOT the same as the much-anticipated, much-debated adaptation of Avatar: The Last Airbender, directed by M. Night Shyamalan. Two, two, two Avatars at once!)

It appears that Scout Taylor-Compton has signed on to play Lita Ford in the upcoming Joan Jett/Lita Ford movie, The Runaways, along with Kristen Stewart as Jett and Dakota Fanning as Cherie Currie; this is notable (to me) only in that Taylor-Compton will, in my mind, forever be Dean Forrester’s little sister Clara on Gilmore Girls. Remember? When Rory goes to Dean’s house to stalk him, pretends to be a Girl Scout, and makes Clara cry? Just me? Okay.

See you on the flip side, everybody. Have a good week.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Quotation Sensation: We have a winner!

by

centerstage_l

As Chuck Berry would say, it goes to show you never can tell—you quotation guessers are nothing if not unpredictable. After the snap that was Flight of the Navigator, I thought you’d have last week’s quotation pegged before I actually even posted it. Surely, I thought, every woman (and some men) born between 1975 and 1985 would be writing in, pulling hair, clawing to have the first guess. And then….nothing.

But let this be a lesson to you: never give up on the power of the internet and the people on it. Just as I was about to give up and make my “neener neener, I don’t have to write a prize cheer” post, reader Carrie chimed in with the correct answer! This quotation:

“‘I’m just trying to be honest. That’s what friends do.’
‘I guess that would explain why you have so many friends.’”

comes from Center Stage, everybody’s favorite drama-rama dance company movie from 2000. Congratulations, Carrie! Well played. Danced. Whatever.

As promised, your cheer:

You know the steps!
You know the song!
You know the quote!
You can’t go wrong!

Goooooo, Carrie! *backflips* *….grand jetes?*

Next quotation goes up later in the week.

, , ,

Risky Proposal

by

gs_reynoldsbul_080606_main

There was a time, awhile back, when Sandra Bullock swore off of romantic comedies. After 2002’s Two Weeks Notice, she broke up—so to speak—with the very genre that had made her career, essentially stating that romantic comedies had simply stopped being any good (to be fair, one might logically bring up Two Weeks’ Notice in that particular argument). Since then, she’s made several non-comic movies (notably Crash, which won Best Picture in 2004) and called it good.

Seven years later, she’s back: her new movie, The Proposal, is…you guessed it. A difficult Canadian book editor (redundant or oxymoron?) living in the States blackmails her assistant (Ryan Reynolds) into marrying her in order to stay in the country. Awkwardness ensues; I believe there’s a trip to Alaska involved. One assumes they fall in love.

So, what is this for Bullock? A comeback, so-called? An admission that sometimes being a dramatic actress is sort of boring, and that she’d rather be in something that makes her laugh, let alone the rest of us? Is she finally realizing that she had a good thing all along, and will now ditch the sexy bad boy for the true love that’s always been for her? Will Marvin Gaye or Al Greene play in the background while she runs to catch him at the airport? Maybe, and maybe not. Apparently she’s back in the romantic comedy business not to play the cute ingenue—she turns 45 this year—but to sink her teeth into something a little more fun: the chick that nobody really likes, but every actress really likes to play. Call her Miranda Priestley in the rough. (Full disclosure, because it’s my job to look this stuff up: Bullock has another romantic comedy due in September—All About Steve, in which she gets just a tad stalkery over a blind date (Bradley Cooper); her role there does seem plenty quirky, but let’s face it: she’s still the romantic lead. Old habits die hard.)

The question is whether she can pull off the switch. I have no doubt that she can pull off being cold and rude and all of the things her character is supposed to be, nor, obviously, do I question her chops when it comes to being awkward and likable. But can she have it both ways—make us hate her and make us love her (she’s the heroine, remember) at the same time? It’s a fine balance, and the result remains to be seen. If she makes it work, she might be poised for a whole new phase of her career, and the rest of us can only benefit from her success.

, , ,

Away We Go

by

2009_away_we_go_005

If you’re going to see the new dramedy Away We Go, it’s best to try and separate the movie from all of the other movies it inevitably brings to mind. It draws parallels from a whole slew of films from the last decade or so—Juno; Garden State; elements of the Wes Anderson movies; the list goes on and on—but it neatly sidesteps most of the pitfalls of the genre, due mostly to good casting and the light hand of director Sam Mendes.

Away We Go is basically a comedy, in both the modern and classical senses of the word: in the months before their first child is born, a young couple (John Krasinski and Maya Rudolph) travel North America in search of their ideal future lifestyle, and ponder the difficulties of adulthood along the way. External conflict is minimal; funny things happen; the entire cast of characters (spoiler alert!) doesn’t die at the end. But then, it’s a Mendes comedy—his first—which seems to mean that the comedy is almost incidental; he’s clearly in it, directorially, for the poignancy of people working out their lives, tinged with both sorrow and hope. (This is not to cast aspersions on Mendes’s sense of humor, but forgive me if his filmography does not say, to me, “great at parties.”) And so although it’s a very funny movie, the humor is rooted more in Dave Eggers and Vendela Vida’s script—the voice is occasionally Eggers in stereo—than in the visual style or the general feel of the movie. It’s a strange divide, the director keeping his hands off the comedy and simply moving the characters around, but it seems to work.

First, as Bert and Verona move around the continent, Mendes imparts a particular visual style, full of motion and travel and place. In nearly every scene, they’re moving horizontally: walking, standing still on a moving sidewalk, driving, flying. It’s basic—we get it, they’re in motion—but it’s more than these kinds of small movies often spring for. Also, Mendes seems determined to stare emotion in the face but not to overdo it. The movie is full of the kind of painfully earnest scenes that so often turn into pure cheese before our very eyes—but somehow, due to Mendes’s delicate direction, manage to stop just short. Several times, during particular scenes, I thought, “I think I’m supposed to hate this. I am definitely supposed to hate this. Why do I not hate this?” Maybe it’s the simplicity with which he treats these moments (no swelling music, no chases to the airport), or maybe it’s just that he, in all his filmic sobriety, doesn’t seem to think they’re cheesy; in any case, we are charmed into thinking they aren’t, either.

This is likely to be both a breakout role and more of the usual for Krasinski; his character, Bert, is like HBO Jim Halpert, so that he’s not so much acting differently as getting more time and space to do what he does really well. In the long run, Krasinski may well play variations on Jim Halpert for the rest of his career—either because that’s what he can do, or because that’s what everybody thinks he can do—but it may work out for him, simply because he comes up with so many ways to be a normal, funny guy. This movie shows off his physicality (also a factor in Leatherheads, the high point of which was Krasinski playing drunk) and the things he does with his voice, and the sheer joy he seems to get out of both of the above. Rudolph, a surprising choice for something so far from her previous job on SNL, occasionally interacts with the script in ways that are awkward or come off as explain-y, but is also generally good; her delivery of a particular story toward the end of the movie is probably more than enough to cover any weird moments earlier in the movie.

Both Krasinski and Rudolph have plenty of talent to work off of, as well; highlights include the 100% reliable Allison Janney as a woman with absolutely no filters and Maggie Gyllenhaal as a hilariously/infuriatingly liberal and self-righteous mother (on refusing to use a stroller: “I love my babies! Why would I want to push them away from me?”), and Melanie Lynskey and Chris Messina as a couple whose perfect life turns out to be perfectly melancholy. A whole host of experienced comedians come and go in supporting roles, as well; the only painful thing here is the realization that most of these people won’t actually be onscreen together.

If you’re thinking of seeing Away We Go—if the trailer hasn’t totally digusted you; if you like the cast; if you’re into small stories about regular people—then you’ll probably enjoy it. There’s certainly plenty to enjoy, and a particular sense of Mendes’s grown-up-ness, to boot. Maybe it’s just a natural progression.

, , , , , , ,

About Cinema Hype

A blog about all things film: the good, the bad, and the really, really ugly. Check us out for news, reviews, haikus, and also other things that don't rhyme, like movie quotations, polls, and commentary. And we won't throw popcorn at you or kick your seat.

Cinema Hype Author(s)

Entertainment & Music Channel Posts

  • Liveblogging the Oscars: Act III
    Okay, we're in it for the long haul, gang. Not much longer now. Awww, I kind of like the In Memoriam montage. And I like Queen Latifah. I feel like these two things make some kind of a weird [...]
  • Liveblogging the Oscars: Act II
    Jessica Biel, why are you telling me about the scientific Oscars? Isn't this sort of akin to the time Denise Richards played a nuclear scientist in that really bad James Bond movie? I...think [...]
  • Liveblogging the Oscars: Act I
    Well, here we are. The Superbowl of the film year, only with more sequins and fewer beer commercials. Are we excited yet? This year, in an attempt to counteract the downward ratings spiral [...]
  • Steve Irwin's Birthday
    On this date in 1962, Steve "The Crocodile Hunter" Irwin was born -- no doubt in little tan shorts. I have no idea how he got the nickname "Crocodile Hunter" as he didn't actually kill the crocs he [...]
  • Review: Pride and Glory
    OK, so I am a HUGE fan of cop dramas for some reason. I don't really know what the attraction is but if there are cops, I'm there. So as soon as I saw the badge in the previews for this movie I knew [...]
  • Greatest Rock Song?
    Of all the classics coming from the vault we call "Rock-n-Roll", ya can't get any more genuine than Bob Dylan's Like A Rolling Stone. The song was crowned by (of all places) Rolling Stone magazine [...]
  • INXS Loses Fortune
    It was the ultimate in rags-to-riches stories for the new INXS lead singer, J. D. Fortune. He rose from living in his car to superstardom as their new vocalist on the VH1 reality TV show ‘Rockstar: [...]
  • Crop Circles Are Pretty
    The argument over the origin of crop circles is still going on, despite many human artists coming forward and showing how they did it. Some simple crop circles do seem to be made by the wind. Many [...]
  • Judd Apatow's "Funny People" Movie Trailer w/ Adam Sandler and Seth Rogan is Another Winner!
    Judd Apatow has been behind some of the most real to life and hilariously over the top comedies of the past few years; "Knocked Up", "40 Year Old Virgin", "Superbad", "Pineapple Express", [...]
  • Robin Thicke's "Sweetest Love" Music Video is Sexy
    I am a huge fan of Robin Thicke and his soothing R&B style. Not only is he a major dream boat but he has the voice to back it up. I would even say that he has bigger an dbetter singing chops [...]

Hot Off The Press